Wednesday, May 9, 2012

D-DAY IN PALO: Archbishop Du's Installation, part 1


I guess I've been quite remiss about announcing the long awaited news of the new Shepherd for the Palo archdiocese. Bishop John Ferrosuelo Du of Dumaguete was appointed by Pope Benedict XVI to succeed Archbishop José S. Palma in the metropolitan See of Palo upon the latter's appointment as the Archbishop of Cebu, replacing Ricardo Cardinal Vidal, who retired about two years ago. Bishop Du's appointment was made public on February 25, 2012. At least I could pride myself for being one of the first to get to know the joyful news, thanks to a priest friend currently studying at the Vatican school for diplomats. I got to receive the news in real time; I could remember breathless out of emotion as I tried to communicate the news through Facebook. After conveying the news, I immediately went down to the sacristy to offer a Mass of thanksgiving. 

I was hoping to be able to make it to the installation, but i soon learned that I would be arriving about two weeks after the event. For the second time thus I would be absent in the installation of the Archbishop of Palo, and considering that His Grace is in his prime, we won't be witnessing any installation for a long time. 

I will be posting the first pictures that come form the other side of the world where these exciting things are taking place.

the program of activities


The Archbishop-elect's arrival in Ormoc from Cebu was marked by
a simple service in honor of Our Lady at the parish church of
Sts. Peter and Paul. He was received by the Archdiocesan
Administrator, Msgr. Jaime Villanueva, and the parish priest, Fr. Gilbert
Urbina.






After taking some refreshments in Ormoc, accompanied by a good number
of the clergy from Dumaguete, he made for Palo, where after a two-hour ride,
he was feted by the local clergy of Palo--his from now on.



Archbishop-elect Du and his predecessor, Archbishop Palma of Cebu.
I hope to post more pictures as they come...

Sunday, May 6, 2012

AN AUSTRALIAN PRIEST MARRIES A FILIPINA, AND MY TAKE ON THIS...


A Catholic priest in Australia has made a controversial revelation: he has been married to a Filipina for a year now.
 

According to Yahoo! Australia's 7News, Father Kevin Lee, a priest for 20 years in Glenmore Park, Sydney, admits "living a double life" with his wife Josephina, whom he met in the Philippines.

“So I've fallen in love and I've got married and it's outside of most people's awareness, but I'm sure people within the church could have had a suspicion,” Lee told 7News.

The Australian priest claimed that there are many others like him and that he pitied those “sacrificing” priests around the world who are denying themselves a relationship.
 

“That's one of the reasons that motivated me to make public my admission that I'm one of those people who's been a pretender: To draw to the attention of the public that there are more like me, in fact most of them,” Lee was quoted as saying.
 
“I feel sorry for them, I really do, but I think they need to admit they are not being led properly. I think celibacy has to go as a prerequisite for being a minister in the Catholic religion,” he added.
 

While urging for the abolition of celibacy, Lee also plans to write a book about what he believes is the wider wrongdoing of fellow priests.
 
However, after making a public confession of his marriage, 7News reported that Lee has been removed from his position as parish priest and has been excommunicated by the church.
 

The head of the diocese, Bishop Anthony Fisher, denied Lee's claim that most priests live double lives and that the hierarchy knew of his marriage.
 
“As Father Kevin is aware, by his actions he can no longer operate as a priest and as a result I will immediately be appointing an administrator to Padre Pio parish,” Fisher said in a statement.
 
MY TAKE:
This piece of news doesn’t surprise me: it’s nothing new; this is not the first time that this has happened, nor will it be the last.
No, I’m not shocked, nor will I feign outrage at my brother priest’s remarks. However the guy has said some things that have made me thinking.

First of all it doesn’t surprise me that he’ll end up confessing his “marriage”, an announcement which undoubtedly would sadden not only the community that he had been building up for so long, but would also wound the greater community that is the Church. Such things cannot be kept under wraps for so long. I don’t know how to cook rice, but from what I’ve observed, the contents of a bubbling pot tend to spill out sooner or later (though in most cases, it’s more sooner than later). It doesn’t surprise me; the guy has got the whole package: the girl’s got looks (she’s quite a catch), and she’s Filipina, and that means that stereotypically he’s got someone who’s caring and loving. But most of all because, as he himself admitted, he has been living a double life.

There you got it.

Celibacy doesn’t have to get the blame for that. It’s like saying that, having been caught committing adultery, you blame being married to your wife. That is why I kinda reacted when Fr. Kevin (he is, after all, an ordained priest) said that he pitied those “sacrificing” priests around the world who were denying themselves of a relationship.

I would daresay that this is another misstep that he had committed. I am no judge of the heart, nor would I judge him, but then I was thinking about the way he had been considering his whole priestly life of twenty years: is priesthood not a relationship, and a loving one at that? Was it not supposed to be a life of prayer, and prayer understood as a relationship? When a priest ceases to pray, that is when he feels most alone, and turns around looking for relationships. Now I’m not saying that Fr. Kevin doesn’t pray, however. But intuitively I know that there has never been a priest who took his prayer life seriously who left the priesthood, no matter how tough things were going.

I think a double life in anyone—whether he a priest or a married man—is caused by the fact that he has lost his center of gravity. A married man begins to offer more than just a cursory glance at other women than his wife because his life has ceased to revolve around her. In the case of the priest this is because his personal relationship with Jesus Christ has waned.

“I feel sorry for them, I really do. I think that they need to admit that they are not being led properly. I think celibacy has to go as a prerequisite for being a minister in the Catholic religion”, Fr. Lee says. One could invent a thousand and one reasons against the discipline of clerical celibacy. Priests are supposed to be smart. But in the end one could only be sorry for himself. Fr. Lee may be right in some way when he referred to priests who are still in the ministry living a double life the same way as he does as needing to be led properly (we have also a crisis of episcopal authority and shepherding in the Church), but celibacy is not the reason for the scandal that he has helped in unleashing. If he thinks that it’s time for celibacy to go, I respect for his personal opinion, and am glad that we could agree to disagree on this point. Thank God the Magisterium of the Catholic Church doesn’t depend on personal opinion, or consensus, or majority, or polls.

This piece of news doesn’t shock nor anger nor discourage me. It’s nothing new, as I’ve said; I wonder why they placed this kind of thing in the first place. It all the more bolsters the conviction that much of the media nowadays thrives not on the truth but on sensationalism: the truth doesn’t seem to be so popular nowadays.

But this does move me to something, however. More than anything else, this has moved me to fall on my knees. This guy, and the rest who seem to have their fifteen seconds of fame for leaving the priesthood—Fr. Alberto Cutie, Fr. John Corappi, and now this—were better priests than me. If they were able to let this happen in their life, how much more in my mine? Only God’s grace could save me from the same fate, and my fidelity to that grace. As they say it in Spanish, no somos nada, we’re nothing.

I could sure thank Fr. Kevin for pointing out the root cause of this trouble.

FIFTH SUNDAY OF EASTER: FROM THE VINE TO THE BRANCHES



The imagery that the Lord presents in the Gospel for this Sundays jibes very well with the season in which we are presently in, and I am not merely referring to Easter. For us who are here in more temperate zones in the northern hemisphere, we are already in the middle of spring. This may raise some concerns for those who are suffer from allergies or are particularly sensitive to pollen, but for the greater part, it is very much evident that the barrenness and the hard cold of winter have given way to the freshness of spring. Where once there was merely barren earth, fresh shoots have sprung up, and seemingly dried twigs have brought forth fresh green shoots. Spring shows us that the earth, which seemed dead, is actually alive. This brings to consider once again the message of the liturgical season of Easter, which we are in.

To sum it all, the gift and grace of Easter is nothing less than new life in Christ. This new life we have all received in Baptism, and in the other sacraments of initiation that go with it—Confirmation and the Eucharist. Through these sacraments, with us being inserted in the death of Christ, we are also brought back to life with him. It is not the life that we used to live before: now it is something new, because before of we have been slaves of sin and death, now we are sons and daughters, co-heirs with the only begotten Son of God.

In the Gospel this Sunday, the Lord teaches us that the only way to keep this new life going within us is to live it in union with him, and in order to express this, he resorts to the image of the vine and the branches: “I am the vine, you are the branches”. The image conveys something that seems to be quite evident to us: branches cannot live on their own; they need to be attached to that which truly channels the sap that gives life to them, which is none other than the vine. Likewise, in order to live this new life, which has been given to us by the Lord as a grace—a free gift, we need to be in union with Jesus Christ. This is what Christian life basically is: a life lived in union with Christ, separated from whom we can do nothing. It is a life that is meant to be fruitful, and by this we mean that it bring forth fruits of holiness. Jesus says “Whoever remains in me and I in him will bear much fruit”: the fruit referred to in this saying is the holiness of life made fruitful by union with Christ (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2074). A Christian cannot afford to be barren; no joy could be had in being found without fruit (remember that the only creature cursed by the Lord was a fig tree, doomed to be sterile forever).

Where do we live this union with Christ? Basically it is found in our life of prayer, which is none else but being with him. Prayer is actually a relationship, very much like the ones that we have. The quality of our relationships depends on the intensity of our union. We prefer to stay more with those whom we love more, and this love transforms us; the lesser time and attention we spend, the lesser love that we cultivate in our hearts, and the less we are transformed by these people, and vice versa. Prayer is union with Jesus Christ, Son of God and our Lord: the moments that we spend with him in the silence of our ordinary life, the things that we do out of love for him in secret—this is prayer.

Union is also fostered in our sacramental life: Jesus continues to touch us through the sacraments in the most profound way. If one doesn’t go to Mass every Sunday as he should, allowing himself to be touched by the Lord in the liturgy, I doubt that that person could actually maintain such a relationship. In the spiritual life, a so-called long-distance relationship simply does not exist: or we are personally touched by Christ in the most profound way through the sacraments, or we don’t allow ourselves to be touched at all. The liturgy of this Sunday clearly reminds us of this contact, when in one of the prayers of the Mass we here that by this holy exchange of gifts (the bread and wine turned into the Lord’s Body and Blood), we share in God’s divine life (cfr. Prayer over the Gifts, 5th Sunday of Easter).

Just as the branches go green, flourish and bring forth fruit because of the sap that flows into them from the great vine, so we too grow in spiritual gifts as we are united to Christ. In the First Reading are made to see the situation of the community of believers in the Acts of the Apostles: The Church throughout all Judea, Galilee and Samaria was at peace. It was being built up and walked in the fear of the Lord, and with the consolation of the Spirit it grew in numbers (Acts 9:30-31). Separated from Christ, we cannot hope to grow or progress; far from his grace we do not even halt, but rather retrocede. Instead of growing up life strong cedars that grow tall and strong, providing shade and shelter, we get stunted like bonsais, interesting to look at perhaps, but useless.

It is only being in union with Jesus that we could heed the admonition in the Second Reading, taken from the first letter of John: Children, let us love not in word or speech, but in deed and in truth. There is nothing more pathetic than a Christian who is incapable of loving, and who cannot profess this love in his life. A Christian who does not love is a sad one, and when a Christian is sad, that is very serious indeed. For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that whoever believes in him may not perish, but may have eternal life(Jn 3:16); my commandment is this: love one another as I have loved you (cfr. Jn 15:12): love is at the heart of the Gospel message, and we live in the fullness of this message as we make this message alive in us.

May our union with Christ show us how to live this love concretely in our ordinary life.  With the sap of grace form the Vine, who is Jesus, flowing in us, may we live according to the newness of life that he has won for us with his death and resurrection. AMEN, ALLELUIA!

FIRST READING: Acts 9:26-31
SECOND READING: 1Jn 3:18-24
GOSPEL: Jn 15:1-8

Saturday, April 28, 2012

IT'S NEVER TOO LATE TO SAY: "CHRIST IS RISEN, ALLELUIA!!!


After a rather lengthy absence from this blog I've decided to push of the stone that has kept this space entombed for quite a while....

FOURTH SUNDAY OF EASTER: SHEPHERD AND STONE REJECTED



The Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want, in verdant pastures he gives me repose….who among us could not be familiar with these words of the twenty-third psalm, which for generations has presented comfort and light for many a troubled soul? The liturgy this Sunday, the fourth of Easter, brings the image of the shepherd to mind. As we hear the words of the Lord in the Gospel: I am the good shepherd (Jn 10:11), we are brought face to face with an image which scriptural tradition of Israel has always used in order to express the love that the Lord has for his people. From of old, the people of Israel had been an agricultural people, devoted to the cultivation of land and of animals. In their life of faith, the God of Israel had revealed to them gradually the good news of his love; through simple images taken from the chores and realities of daily life, man came to know of God who watched over them more than a vine-grower did over his vineyard, and cared for them more than they themselves cared for their own livestock. Israel was not only the chosen portion of the Lord; he was their shepherd, who jealously watched and guided them faithfully, leading them to greener pastures. The shepherd became the figure that symbolized an authority based on solicitude and love for those whom the shepherd exercised his dominion. The kings and priests of Israel were considered as shepherds of the people, inasmuch as they received the mandate from the Lord, chief Shepherd of Israel, to watch and protect. These shepherds of Israel had their own shortcomings and infidelities; through his prophets God promised to raise a shepherd who would definitely take care of his sheep, Israel.

The prophecies come to their fulfillment in the figure of Christ. He is the Good Shepherd who takes good care of his sheep. Like in the Old Testament, the image of Jesus as the Good Shepherd presents the love that God has for each and everyone of us. Christian art from the earliest centuries have been inspired by this image, as it presents the reality of God’s love for man.

But how is the love of a shepherd?  I am the good shepherd. A good shepherd lays down his live for the sheep. This love is not a mere sentiment, but one whose proof of authenticity is the ultimate sacrifice of a life generously offered on the Cross. The First Reading and the Responsorial Psalm present to us another image found in the Scriptures, that of the stone rejected by the builders. It points to the passion of the Christ, who was rejected and subjected to suffering and death, so as to be able to be the source of life for us all, and so as to be the cornerstone of a new building: the Church.

At one point we might see no relation between the two images, but our reflection would lead us to consider that Christ is the Good Shepherd whose love made him offer his life for his sheep, an offering which consisted in the passion, death and resurrection. The love of that the Lord Jesus had for us did not make him only give up his life for us by stretching his arms on the wood of the Cross-, suspended between heaven and earth. This is why the Father loves me, because I lay down my life in order to take it up again. No one takes it from me, but I lay it down on my own. I have power to lay it down, and power to take it up again. In order that we may have life, the Lord offered his on the Cross, in order to rise up again from the dead, giving us the opportunity to live with Him. He is the Good Shepherd because he laid down his life for us, and he claims it back again, so that we might truly live a life that knows no end. This life promised to us is the very life of the Son of God, not that of a servant nor a slave, but that of a child of God, and it is in this that we could see the extent to which the love of God has favored us, as we see in the Second Reading: See what love the Father has bestowed on us that we may be called children of God. Yet so we are! (1 Jn 3:1)

I am the Good Shepherd. This is something which ought to stimulate us in our Christian life. Because, inserted in Christ through baptism, we are ourselves are called to be shepherds. St. Thomas Aquinas comments that this is not possible however, if we do not identify ourselves with the very love of Christ, if we do not live it. In this Good Shepherd Sunday, we are called to remember in a very special way the pastors of the Church, that they may be truly shepherds after the heart of God, and that the Lord of the harvest may continue to raise us men who would shepherd the Church with the love of Christ.

But this Sunday is not only about our priests and bishops. It also ought to remind us that we too have some shepherding to do. Each one of us is entrusted with the care of persons in one way or the other. And shepherding is nothing else but nurturing: helping people grow. We cannot make this happen without generosity and sacrifice on our part. In the same that Christ the Good Shepherd laid down his life for us, we too have to lay down our lives for others. Touched by the light and grace of the Risen Christ, parents may learn to give themselves more generously for their children, ensuring that what these receive are things which are truly for their good; lay leaders in the Church are empowered to live fully their vocation to be the yeast that makes society rise; civil authorities become prudent and unselfish in their commitment to seek the true good of their constituents, and so on and so forth.

Lord Jesus, Good Shepherd of us all, may your love for each of us bear fruit in the Church and beyond its borders, so that we may be shepherds for a world that has so much need of the warmth of your love. AMEN, ALLELLUIA!

FIRST READING: Acts 4:8-12
SECOND READING: 1 Jn 3:1-2
GOSPEL: Jn 10:11-18

Saturday, March 24, 2012

FIFTH SUNDAY OF LENT (B): THE SUPREME PARADOX




“Unless a grain of wheat falls down to the ground and dies, it remains just a grain of wheat; but if it dies, it produces much fruit.”

It is an undisputed fact that all of us want to live, and have life to the full. Nobody in his right mind would like to die, and to give his life away, just for the sake of giving it. Each one of us would want as much as possible to live life to its full potential, and it is this desire that makes us recoil from the thought of just existing; somehow the expression “get a life” would convey to us that we are not just here to stay put nor just simply exist. Each of us desires to live (not just exist), and more than that, we want to live it to the full. Going further, we may ask ourselves what the expression “living life to the full” means. I myself would be at a loss to tell you exactly what that would mean on my own, but I have the feeling that life could never be lived and enjoyed to the full if it shut out from growth. When we continue to grow and age with grace, this is when we live life fruitfully. But then, that would lead us to consider another question: what does it mean to grow?

In the Gospel we hear the Lord saying these familiar words: “Unless a grain of wheat falls down to the ground and dies, it remains just a grain of wheat; but if it dies, it produces much fruit.” Jesus teaches us something important about life, using an example from nature. In this temperate region where I presently am, the harsh winter has gradually ceded to spring, with its gentle promise of new life and growth. Where previously there had been dry and seemingly inert branches, flowers are blooming, with the concealed promise of future fruits. But before these flowers ever came to be, before those fruits could ever be able to bend branches, the seed has to let go in order to give up its shoots; the flower has to give up its fragrance and its beauty, in order that it may bear fruit.

“Whoever loves his life loses it; and whoever hates his life in this world will preserve it for life eternal”. The law of life has been imprinted by God’s wisdom in the cycle of nature. The miracle of life does not exclude death from itself; rather it forms part of life. Dying in order to life: this is the supreme paradox of life. This is true in our life as Christians, as persons called to live. Jesus shows us that if we want to live, we have to let go, knowing that life moves on, and that the only true good that we have to hold on to is the very love of God, that does not age, that does not turn brittle, that does not fade. In the present state of things, letting go is a very important part of life; we cannot live to the full is we are too full of things that are perishable, things that moths eat and destroy, and that thieves could steal. We cannot live to the full if we insist on enjoying things as if they were meant to last forever, as if they could give us any real and lasting joy. Jesus the Lord, with the words of the Gospel, opens our eyes and allows us to see that we have to let go of things and make it our aim to make as our prized possession the only thing that endures and really matters: our union with God. This is something so great that it even merits us forgetting ourselves. this friendship, this love is so great, its fruit so satisfying, that the very price that we must pay is our very self: He who does not deny himself and take up his cross is not worthy of me (cfr. Matt. 10:38; 16:24), our Lord says. This self-denial with view for growth and eternal life is, in a certain way, at the heart of the Lenten season, which is fast drawing to a close.

But this self denial must be rooted firmly in that which IS at the very center of the Paschal Mystery: LOVE. In the First Reading we hear in the book of the prophet Jeremiah of the Lord promising to place his law in the hearts of the Israelites, one that would seal his relationship with them as a people particularly his own: “I will place my law within them and write it upon their hearts; I will be their God, and they will be my people”. A law not written on tablets of stones but in hearts of flesh; not carved by hard instruments, but imprinted with the gentle movement of the Holy Spirit, finger of God’s right hand. This law is none other than the law of love.
But how do we define love? Before our eyes we see the Son of Man being handed over to the chief priests and the scribes, and the leaders of the people, scourged and maltreated, we see him crucified, and die on the cross, only to rise again. Man does not need to define what love is; God has defined it for him. Thinking about love, we are brought once again to consider the example of the seed that dies: love does not consist so much in possessing and having, than in the giving oneself. As such it presents a power not given to everybody. Everybody could receive and possess, but only the strongest and the purest of heart could give of themselves. And by his filial love and total obedience, Jesus on the Cross gives the supreme definition of what love is: the unselfish offering of his whole self as a gift to his Father, and as the price of our redemption. Herein lies a power which the devil never understood, but which served to allow him to recognize that he who hung on the Cross was the God who had defeated him, once and for all. In his generous self-giving, the Son of God gives those who unite their lives with him the same power to offer themselves and to participate in his redemption.

The Crucifixion by El Greco

The Cross is the definition to love that God gives: patient and kind, humble, not jealous nor boastful, not rejoicing at the wrong, but is happy in the truth; a love that bear all things and endures all things (cfr. 1 Co 13: 4-7). It is love because it is obedient, as we hear from the letter to the Hebrews, in the Second Reading: “Son though he was, he learned obedience from what he suffered; and when he was made perfect, he became the source of eternal salvation for all who obey him”.
May the proximity of the most solemn feasts of the Christian year serve us all the more to intensify our struggle to be worthy of God’s love, repeating incessantly that prayer of the Psalmist: create a clean heart in me, O God. Only a heart that is pure can renounce itself, and make itself capable of loving. A heart that has died to itself is the only one capable of rising again to new life, and live according to the new law of Love, in perfect imitation of the love and obedience of the Son for His Father.

Sunday, March 4, 2012

Second Sunday of Lent: GLORY IS ACHIEVED NOBLY THROUGH SACRIFICE




“Do you believe in Jesus Christ, his only Son and Our Lord?” In the baptismal liturgy, just as during the renewal of our baptismal promises, the minister asks us this question. The affirmation, our response “I do believe” to this very important question, points to the capital importance of knowing Christ, getting to know who He really is, because we cannot place our trust and confidence in someone whom we do not know. But then getting to know about Christ doesn’t only mean having a mental outline of his doctrines, in order to be able to give a ready answer to any exam in catechism class; knowing Christ means getting to live with him, or better still, allowing his own life to enter into our own so as to be transformed by it. In a way, the Christian life is a matter of responding to that question of Jesus Christ, posed to his apostles: Who do you say that I am?

Lent presents itself as a worthy avenue of getting to know our Lord more, the grace of God that makes itself manifest in this season of grace give us the light to see him more clearly, in the same way that the closest apostles of Jesus were able to see him in a different light, literally. In the Gospel reading this Sunday, we come to know of Jesus being accompanied by three of his disciples—Peter, James and John—up to Mt. Tabor. Standing there with them, he is transfigured, that is to say, there is a change in his appearance: his face, and even his own clothes, take on a dazzling beauty, such that the evangelist Mark, jotting down Peter’s memories of that event, describes them as whiter than any fuller could ever make them.  Before them, Jesus seems to converse with two figures from the religious tradition of Israel: Moses, who handed over the Law of God to his people, and Elijah, the greatest of Israel’s prophets. Then suddenly, with that impressive sight before them, they find themselves within a thick cloud and hear a voice thundering: This is my beloved Son. Listen to him. Terrified they fall to the ground. With the voice still ringing in their ears, they look up, and see Jesus, and only Jesus.

The transfiguration of the Lord on Mt. Tabor was another one of those moments in the life lived by Jesus with his disciples that allow his followers a glimpse into his identity. No doubt, some of them may have remembered the voice as the same one proclaiming Jesus to his Son when he rose over the waters of the Jordan. The appearance of the Lord, his clothes so white that no fuller on earth could achieve such a whitening effect, would lead them to conclude that such splendor was unearthly, divine.

The experience of the apostles had made them realize that this was no ordinary man they were dealing with. For indeed, nobody had ever taught with such authority in their synagogues, such that even wind and the waves obey him; it was unheard of that anybody could heal a man deaf and mute since birth, who could restore life to those who lay in death; someone who could even walk on the waters, something which the psalms themselves attributed only to God.

This was something that perhaps moved Peter to confess: You are the Christ, the Son of the living God! Aided and moved by the finger of God, the apostle, a witness to many of the wonders made by Jesus, made the confession that would transform him into the rock upon which the faith of the Church rests, the faith upon Jesus Christ, the Son of God (cfr. Mk. 1:1).

But then the experience that the disciples had with the Lord on Tabor wasn’t enough with the glory that they had witnessed. It is not enough to be a witness of the glory of the Son of God. As they were going down, the Lord told them not to tell the vision to anyone until the Son of Man had risen from the dead (cfr.Mk.9:9). It is not enough to focus on the glory of Jesus Christ; it is also precise to know that the only way to share in that glory is through the royal way of the Cross. This was something that the apostles at first would not be able to understand. All of them had that conviction that glory was in store for them, because they had left everything and shared the life of the Master; that they were to share in his reign and in his power seemed certain. In fact, they quarreled over it, so much so, that the Master himself had to give them a lesson in humility in various moments of their life with Him. But what they didn’t know was that there was only one way to share in that glory, and that meant sharing in his passion and death as well.

That the Lord would have to undergo through the scandal of the Cross was too much for his disciples; it was to much for them to stomach, the fact that they descended from the glory of Tabor in order to climb Calvary. But later on, strengthened by the Paraclete, they would make the announcement of His death and resurrection the heart of their preaching, as we would hear in the Second Reading: Christ Jesus it is who died, or rather, was raised, who also is at the right hand of God, who indeed intercedes for us”(Rom. 8:34).

The faith of the apostles is the basis of the faith that we have. What we know of Christ Jesus is founded firmly on the testimony of the apostles themselves, one that continues to resound in our days; it is the same testimony made by the Church, holy, catholic and apostolic. It only in the Church that we can come to know who Christ really is. Nowadays it is easy to construct and image of Christ that is suspiciously attuned to our own convenience, one that, more often than not, seems to deny the cross. It is so easy for us to profess in a Christ who is all glorious, but who does not have the marks of the nails on his hands and feet, and the wound on his side. In an age where it is easy to personalize things, we can always run the risk of making a “personalized Christ”. But a Christ who is personalized in this sense, adjusted to our comfort, to our whims, is a false one, one that cannot save,  one that cannot show us the way to the glory of eternal life.

May our contemplation of Christ transfigured in glory strengthen us to follow by taking our cross and join it to His, knowing that glory is only to be achieved nobly through sacrifice. Amen.