This
Sunday the Church in the Philippines distinguishes itself once again with the
feast of the Sto. Niño, a devotion that not only is typically Filipino, but
that which is at the very core of the people’s identity and history as a
Christian nation (here, as a parenthetical observation, despite of a certain
percentage of Muslims and of the fact that the majority of the archipelago’s
pre-colonial inhabitants were animists, it could never be said that in any
point of its history was the Philippines an Islamic nor an animistic nation.
The evangelization wrought by the missionaries of the Spanish Crown was a big
factor in the building up of our identity as a nation; where there were petty
kingdoms scattered throughout the archipelago, the colonization brought about a
cohesive unity between the islands under the Cross and the Crown). No doubt by
this time, millions of devotees and revelers have congregated at what could be
the centermost metropolis of the Visayas—denominated the Queen City of the
South—Cebu, both out of devotion to the Holy Child Jesus, whose image was the
first Christian image to be revered in this part of the Far East, and also to
celebrate in what has become the Philippine’s answer to Mardi Gras of Rio de
Janeiro and New Orleans. This multitudinous gathering comes almost a week after
another one done as well during the first week of the year, though this one is marked
more by devotion not lacking in fanaticism than by a reason for celebrating.
This Monday’s feast of the Black Nazarene of Quiapo was marked by the usual
confluence of millions jostling in order to touch the 17th century
image (a remnant of trade relations by way of galleons between Manila and
Mexico) with their handkerchiefs and towels in the belief of its healing
powers, while accompanying it in a procession that lasted fourteen hours. The
annual feast and its highlight—the grand procession back to its normal place in
the Basilica of Quiapo—was celebrated amidst reports of a possible terrorist
attack, one which the President himself made out in a rare press conference
made before the date. This didn’t even make a dent in the devotees faith,
resolved to fulfill their yearly panata
or personal vow. Urged on by their resolve and personal need, the same millions
braved the annual pandemonium around the carriage that bears the darkened image
of the Savior on the way to Calvary.
The
proximity of both feasts calls my attention as we celebrate another feast that
is typically Filipino, and this I mean in two ways: in the first place,
liturgically speaking, because both are rarities, and from a foreign point of
view, one that could not be easily understood. Secondly, both as images and
devotions they give us a view of what the identity of the Filipino Christian is
all about.
Regarding
to the first point, refering to the Black Nazarene, as a liturgical feast it
stands out like a sore thumb, having just ended the Christmas season days
before (this year, it was celebrated on the day where in some part of the Latin
Church people were ending Christmas with the Feast of the Baptism of the Lord).
The feast of the Sto. Niño could raise some foreign liturgical eyebrows for the
same reason, now that Christmas had ended. Secondly, it is truly Filipino
because of the significance it has in the nation’s history. As I had pointed
out earlier, among the numerous images venerated by Catholics in the
Philippines, that of the Holy Child of Cebu is certainly the first that came to
the islands, and consequently, not only is it the oldest, but certainly its
devotion is among the most widespread among the Filipino people; at par with
the Sinulog celebration in Cebu we
have the Ati-atihan of Iloilo and the
Pintados-Kasadyaan of Tacloban (the Sangyaw of the same city is a very
recent invention). As historical records would tell us, the image was arrived
to these islands as a gift made out to the premier wife of Humabon of Cebu by
Ferdinand Magellan during the first expedition in march 1521. This first
encounter between the Spaniards and the natives (which was to end tragically,
for the Spaniards at least), though not enough to plant the Cross and the
Christian faith firmly upon this part of Asia, was nevertheless the seed that
was to grow with the evangelization of the islands, a movement that coincided
with its political subjugation under Spanish rule, which was to last for three
hundred years, form 1565 until 1898, the year that signaled the end of the
Spanish colonial era. One merit of the this colonial rule was the unification
of the islands under one government; where there was once a group of islands
with petty kingdoms, the evangelization and colonization of what became las islas Filipinas under the Spanish
crown brought about the a unified conscience, that was to grow and mature under
the American administration, interrupted for two years during the Second World
War with the Japanese Occupation.
The
Image of the Nazarene, Nuestro Padre
Jesús Nazareno, came in the midst of a prosperous era marked by trade
relations between Manila and Mexico. Ships would ply the route from the Spanish
port in Asia—Manila—laden with goods destined for markets in Nueva Castilla
(Mexico) and the old world. The same galleons would return from the other end
in Acapulco back to Manila laden with Mexican silver and other goods. In one of
those trips came the image of the Nazarene. No, better still, one could talk of
images since there were two of them.
I won’t elaborate on this here though, as I would be digressing from my point.
Both
the images and the devotion that Filipinos have towards these representation of
Jesus Christ in two instances of his life—both as a child and as a grown man,
could say something about their spiritual life as a people. I have long
wondered about the devotion that my people have towards the Sto. Niño and the
Nazareno, a devotion that is seconded only by the Filipino’s love for the
Mother of God (the Philippines, to use a well-known phrase, is a nation in love
with Mary, un pueblo amante de María,
and its love affair with the Virgin is as interesting as its strong devotion to
the ones highlighted in this present reflection).
In
the first place, I could well say that these January devotions reflect how the
Filipino sees himself in relation to God. With regards to the Holy Child, the
Filipino has always known himself to be small before God, a child in the arms
of his Father. Without prejudice to people of other nationalities, I could say
that the Filipino is instinctively religious. Of course religion as a human
phenomenon could be given in man himself, but the Filipino has no qualms in
praying in public; given the circumstances, he is at home with the spiritual,
and this spirituality is one that is trusting, a spirituality in which
surrender to the higher power occupies an important part. The Pinoy is
accustomed to living surrounded by children, and is quite fond of them; anyway,
who isn’t fond of a cute baby? The country’s population is relatively young, a
promising one that could yield a veritable workforce, given the chance. Just as
a child is desirable and lovable in the eyes of its parent, the Filipino,
seeing himself as a child, also knows himself to be loved, and this love is
that which makes him strong, even in the darkest of times, even in the midst of
suffering. There is never any doubt that the Filipino finds his strength in
hard times surrounded by his family and those who care for him most; however,
one source of strength that he can dispose of as well is prayer, drawing from
those deep spiritual reserves that find its roots in his Christian faith.
Speaking
of suffering, everybody would agree that the present generation of Filipinos
had never known a period of bonanza or prosperity as such; each turn of history
would seem worse than the last. Philippine contemporary history, either lived
out individually or as a nation, seems to pass from one crisis to another. The
image of the Black Nazarene seems to be the incarnation of the image of the
suffering Filipino himself; better still, I could say that the Filipino is able
to recognize himself in the image of the suffering Savior on the way to
Calvary, which is perhaps the reason why there he has so much devotion to the
suffering Christ. This identification with the Nazarene, carrying the Cross on
the way to Calvary, is perhaps the reason that lies at the root of its
attraction for the Filipino.
The
Black Nazarene is the image of a God who is never from the situation of those
who suffer, never distant because he shares their suffering, and manifests it
for all to see.
But
there is another reason for its being attractive: though suffering and the
perspective of certain death is evident in the black face of the Savior, within
this sign, we might say, there is the glimmer of the final victory. The
Filipino, though suffering and being accustomed to it, knows and recognizes the
transient nature of suffering, and foresees in a certain manner the glory of
the Resurrection. He knows that suffering will cease, and that life still goes
on. This is something that lies at the heart of the Filipino psyche; this is
the reason for the Filipino’s ability to smile, laugh and celebrate despite of
the bad times; ever a musical people, Filipinos are known to express their pain
even in singing, as they do in times of joy. This is the reason of the
Filipino’s affinity to telenovelas,
which show the long-suffering of the innocent protagonist, whose story always
culminates in triumph.
The
profound reason perhaps why these devotions have so much popularity among the
Filipino people is because they see themselves associated with Christ himself.
When the devotee gazes at the obscure face of the Christ bearing the Cross, he
does not only see his own pain, he also sees his own resurrection. In the same
way, when he celebrates and dances with the image of the Infant in his hands,
he sees himself as a child loved by God, one who would never abandon him to his
fate, as a popular religious Filipino song would say (hindi kita pababaya-an).
One
last thing that this reveals about Filipino Christian religiosity is that it is
Christological and Christ-centered. All of this identification with Christ that
I’ve been talking about, about how Christ shows who and what God is, and how
Christ shows man about man himself—these point to the fact that Filipino
Christianity is in the right route. There is a lot of purification to do, of
course, there is no doubt about this, the experience of the procession and the
fanaticism of many of the Nazarene’s devotees are proof of that, but I guess
that deep within, the Filipino has grasped one central concept of Christology,
which is that of the Incarnation. This is one concept in which through the
person of Jesus Christ, man is able to see and know—and even touch and caress—that
who and which the invisible God is. Also, in the face of Christ, man is able to
know more about who he truly is. In the case of the Filipino devotee, both in the
Sto. Niño and in the Black Nazarene, he sees a God who has come down to man so as
to be embraced and carried, in whom he knows himself to be loved and cherished.
Here he realizes that he is not alone in his suffering, and that, despite of
the darkness of the times, the gloom is not enough to snuff out the flame of
hope that would inevitably lead to the bright day of the Resurrection.
Hello,
ReplyDeleteI would like to use one of your photos for our tarpaulin in honor of Sto. Niño de Cebu. Thank you!!
thanks for this topic. well explained and meaningful. we are going to use this as our guide for our discussion. God bless you more.
ReplyDelete